Federal drug laws create a labeling problem. When you hear the term "drug trafficker," you may think of Pablo Escobar or Walter White, but the truth is that under federal law, drug traffickers include individuals who purchase pseudo-ephedrine for their methamphetamine dealer; function as middleman in a series of little deals; or even pick up a suitcase for the incorrect pal. Thanks to conspiracy laws, everyone on the totem pole can be subject to the same severe obligatory minimum sentences.
To the men and women who prepared our federal drug laws in 1986, this might come as a surprise. According to Sen. Robert Byrd, cosponsor of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986, the reason to attach 5- and ten-year obligatory sentences to drug trafficking was to penalize "the kingpins-- the masterminds who are really running these operations", and the mid-level dealers.
Fast forward twenty-five years. Today, almost everybody convicted of a federal drug crime is founded guilty of "drug trafficking", which typically results in at least a five- or ten-year compulsory prison sentence. That's a great deal of time in federal prison for many individuals who are minor parts of drug trade, the huge majority of whom are males and females of color.
This is the system that federal district Judge Mark Bennett sees every day. Judge Bennett sits on the district court in northern Iowa, and he manages a lot of drug cases., I would have sent 1,092 of my fellow people to federal prison for necessary minimum sentences ranging from sixty months to life without the possibility of release.
The numbers can't communicate the absurd disaster of it all. This is how he explains a current drug trafficking case:
I recently sentenced a group of more than twenty offenders on meth trafficking conspiracy charges. All of them plead guilty. Eighteen were 'pill smurfers,' as federal district attorneys put it, implying their function amounted to routinely buying and delivering cold medication to meth cookers in exchange for extremely little, low-grade quantities to feed their serious dependencies. Many were unemployed or underemployed. A number of were single moms. They did not sell or straight distribute meth; there were no stockpiles of cash, guns or counter surveillance devices. Yet all of them faced compulsory minimum sentences of sixty or 120 months.
They discovered that in 2005, the bulk of the lowest-level drug- and crack-trafficking defendants-- guys and ladies explained as "street-level dealerships", "couriers/mules", and "renter/loader/lookout/ enabler/users"-- received 5- or ten-year mandatory jail sentences. This is specifically true for crack-cocaine accused, many of whom are black; despite the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010, selling a small amount of fracture drug (28 grams) carries the same obligatory minimum sentence-- 5 years-- as offering 500 grams of www.criminallawyerslasvegas.com/drug-conspiracy-defense-las-vegas/ powder drug.
This is the reality for which proponents of serious federal drug laws should account. We can not pretend that heavy sentences for females like Kemba Smith and males like Jamel Dossie are the fluke mistakes of overboard laws. We must admit that our sentencing of small participants in the drug trade to prison terms suggested for the leaders of large drug organizations-- as a common incident, not as an exception. As a result, we unnecessarily send to prison great deals of minor offenders for long periods. Judge Bennett decries the human costs of these sentences:
If lengthy obligatory minimum sentences for nonviolent drug abuser really worked, one might be able to justify them. However there is no proof that they do. I have seen how they leave hundreds of thousands of children parent-less and thousands of aging, infirm and passing away moms and dads childless. They damage households and strongly sustain the cycle of poverty and addiction.
Here, again, we have evidence that Judge Bennett is right: long mandatory sentences are unnecessary for most drug culprits. In 2002 and 2003, Michigan and New York reversed obligatory sentences for drug culprits and provided judges the power to impose shorter sentences, probation, or drug treatment.
For years, Judge Bennett has actually seen a system that does not make good sense. He has actually seen necessary laws composed for the most major, massive drug dealers applied to the men and ladies on the most affordable rungs of the drug trade, and he has actually seen it occur a lot. We when thought of that extreme necessary sentences would be utilized to handle the leaders of big drug operations. It's time our federal drug laws were fit to individuals that they truly target.
If you have been charged with a drug related offense and need qualified representation, contact us to discuss your case.
Contact:
Mace Yampolsky & Associates
625 S 6th St.
Las Vegas, NV 89101
(702) 385-9777